After Justice: John Rawls’ Legacy in the 21st Century – CfP

University of Bucharest, 5 and 6 November 2021

Call for papers

Abstract submission new date: June 30, 2021.

“Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought.”

2021 marks the centennial of John Rawls’s birth and the 50th anniversary of A Theory of Justice’s publication. Rawls’s role in reviving substantial normative interrogations in political philosophy has long been acclaimed by moral and political philosophers, as well as by economists, political scientists, and legal theorists. Even while Rawls himself was rather reluctant to engage directly with ongoing critique of, or answers to, current events, much of the scholarship that he has inspired has massively extended his conceptual distinctions and insights, lines of argument, justificatory structures, and vocabulary, to cover increasing domains in the humanities and social sciences. Our conference explores the legacy of John Rawls and the various ways in which his philosophical thought can be used to understand the transformative political events and crises of the contemporary world that have brought a renewed set of interrogations and have changed the social and political landscape.

Keynote speakers
: Katrina Forrester (Harvard University), Rex Martin (University of Kansas), Bruce Haddock (Cardiff University), and Peri Roberts (Cardiff University).

We welcome all paper contributions addressing Rawls’ philosophical legacy, but are especially interested in the following range of topics:

  • Political philosophy:
    • Ideal vs. non-ideal theory (civil disobedience, structural injustice, racial and gender injustice);
    • Critiques of and alternatives to contractualism;
    • Normative ethics and normative political theory;
    • Methodology of normative reasoning in political philosophy (e.g., models of public reason and justification, thought experiments and political critique);
    • Democratic theory;
    • Pluralism and democratic institutions.
  • Social philosophy:
    • Debates about the constitutive elements of practices and institutions of justice (e.g, subject-matter of justice, types of distributive goods; individualism vs. holism);
    • Luck, equality of opportunity and social justice;
    • Social practices and social critique; new social movements: feminism, anti-racism and post-colonial studies, multiculturalism, environment;
    • Conceptual and normative analyses of the state, institutions, and rules and rule-following;
    • Critique of the capitalist Welfare State, Property-Owning-Democracy, Basic Income, Stakeholder Society, Pre-distribution versus redistribution.
  • Legal philosophy:
    • Natural law vs. legal positivism;
    • Constitutionalism and rule of law;
    • Global and international justice;
    • The genealogy of rights.
  • Moral philosophy:
    • Applied ethics and ethical theory;
    • Methodology of moral reasoning (e.g. reflective equilibrium, division of normative labor, burdens of judgment);
    • Meta-ethics, constructivism, intuitionism;
    • Moral psychology (e.g. the linguistic analogy, virtues of moral insight);
    • History of ethics and moral thought. Kant, Mill, Sidgwick.

The abstracts should be no longer than 500 words (including 4 to 5 keywords from the list of topics above) and should be sent to the following address: 100Rawls@filosofie.unibuc.ro. Please indicate your institutional affiliation alongside the abstract.

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the conference will be held online.

Important dates
Abstract submission: J̶u̶n̶e̶ ̶1̶5̶,̶ ̶2̶0̶2̶1̶, June 30, 2021.
Notifications: August 15, 2021.
Conference: November 5 and 6, 2021.

Global Justice Seminar, November 6, 2021: A roundtable on how to achieve fairness in the global COVID-19 vaccine distribution conducted by Thomas Pogge (Yale University).

Publishing opportunities
We intend to publish one special issue in Public Reason, and another one in the Annals of the University of Bucharest, Philosophy series. Depending on the papers, maybe also one special issue in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.

The Scientific Committee members are Onora O’Neill (University of Cambridge), Catherine Audard (London School of Economics), Ovidiu Caraiani (University Politechnica of Bucharest), Adrian Miroiu (The National University of Political Studies and Public Administration), Adrian Paul Iliescu (University of Bucharest), Romulus Brâncoveanu (University of Bucharest), Eugen Huzum (Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch).

Convenors: Dorina Pătrunsu (University of Bucharest), Camil Pârvu (University of Bucharest), Andrei Poama (Leiden University), Nicolae Dobrei (The National University of Political Studies and Public Administration), Emilian Mihailov (University of Bucharest), Constantin Vică (University of Bucharest), and Radu Uszkai (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies).

Conferința națională online de filosofie teoretică pentru studenți, a patra ediție

PROGRAMUL CONFERINȚEI

Luni, 19 aprilie

ora 10: Maria-Floriana Gațe (Facultatea de filosofie, Universitatea din București) – Evoluția conceptului de „pseudo-problemă” la Carnap și posibile semnificații

ora 12: Costel Cristian (Facultatea de filosofie, Universitatea din București) – Teza incomensurabilității la T. S. Kuhn în contextul filosofiei experimentale din secolul al XVII-lea

Marți, 20 aprilie

ora 10: Ecaterina Forij (Facultatea de Filosofie şi Ştiinţe Social-Politice, Universitatea A. I. Cuza) – Time and temporality – A phenomenological and feminist approach

ora 12:  Radu-Cristian Andreescu (Facultatea de Istorie și Filosofie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca – Arta de peisaj și experiența timpului: trei momente

Miercuri, 21 aprilie, ora 10:

Bică Daian (Facultatea de filosofie, Universitatea din București) – Natural properties at the heart of the scientific practice

Joi, 22 aprilie, ora 10:

Mihai Alexandru Petrișor (Facultatea de filosofie, Universitatea din București) – Dialetheism, Kant și Hegel: ce facem cu limitele?

Vineri, 23 aprilie, ora 10:

Tudor Mărginean (Facultatea de filosofie, Universitatea din București) – Against mental causation as downward causation

 

„Locul virtual” de desfășurare al conferinței este Jurnalul Departamentului de Filosofie Teoretică (aflat la adresa: http://filosofieteoretica.wordpress.com). În cazul fiecărei prezentări, discuțiile online au loc în ziua în care are loc prezentarea.

CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conferința este dedicată studenților la licență și masteranzilor care fac studii de filosofie. Prezentările pot aborda teme de ontologie, metafizică, epistemologie, filosofia limbajului, filosofia minții, filosofia științei și a tehnologiei, filosofia logicii, filosofia religiei, filosofia acțiunii, etică teoretică ș.a. Sunt încurajate atât abordările specifice tradiției filosofiei analitice, cât și cele care se încadrează în tradiția fenomenologică.

A patra ediție a CNOFTS va avea loc în perioada 19-25 aprilie, având ca „loc virtual” de desfășurare Jurnalul Departamentului de Filosofie Teoretică (aflat la adresa: http://filosofieteoretica.wordpress.com).

Cel mult 3 prezentări asincrone (sub forma unor înregistrări video de maxim 20 de minute sau a unor texte de maxim 5 pagini) vor fi publicate în fiecare zi de conferință, autorii fiind rugați să răspundă la întrebările puse în comentarii în ziua respectivă (la începutul zilei următoare secțiunea de comentarii a prezentărilor din ziua precedentă va fi închisă).

Dacă doriți să participați, vă rugăm să ne trimiteți până pe 10 aprilie un scurt rezumat (de cel mult o pagină) al prezentării pe care vă propuneți să o realizați, la adresa: filosofieteoretica[at]gmail.com.

O selecție va fi realizată de către profesorii din Departamentul de Filosofie Teoretică al Facultății de Filosofie, Universitatea din București, urmând ca programul conferinței să fie anunțat până pe 12 aprilie.

Participanții vor fi rugați să ne trimită prezentările cu două zile înainte de publicarea acestora, potrivit programului conferinței.

Seminar cercetare DFT ‘Newton and Descartes on True Motion’

Următoarea conferință din cadrul seminarului de cercetare al Departamentului de Filosofie Teoretică în parteneriat cu CELFIS va fi susținută de Monica Solomon (Stanford University).
Titlul prezentării sale este: ‘Newton and Descartes on True Motion’. Iată şi rezumatul:

‘Isaac Newton’s scholium to the definitions in the Principia (1687/1713/1726) articulates clearly distinctions pertaining to the concepts of time, space, place, and motion. A well-known example therein describes the motion of the water within a revolving bucket. Trivial as it may seem, the example has captured the imagination of philosophers ever since. Recent work in the history and philosophy of science has revealed that the example is best read contextually, as an argument against the Cartesian definition of proper motion.
In this talk I make the further argument that what is truly at stake is finding a quantitatively adequate measure of true motion. The example is not an argument for the existence of absolute space or motion, and the attack against the Cartesian framework is both more substantial and more targeted than it has been previously shown in the literature. This conclusion will then lead us to reconsider the role of the scholium: I suggest that it is a commentary to a set of fundamental physical quantities, and a “space-and-time” scholium only derivatively. Finally, I am going to develop the implications of this analysis for Newton’s methodology of science and its later reception in the eighteenth century.’

Conferința se va desfășura ȋn limba engleză luni, 12 aprilie, orele 18-20. Un link de conectare via Meet va fi distribuit cu câteva minute înainte tuturor celor ce își indică dorința de participare scriind la adresa andrei.marasoiu@filosofie.unibuc.ro.

Seminar cercetare DFT „A few thoughts on later Wittgenstein and quasi-realism”

Următoarea conferință din cadrul seminarului de cercetare al Departamentului de Filosofie Teoretică în parteneriat cu CELFIS va fi susținută de Nicoletta Bartunek.

Titlul prezentării sale este: ‘A few thoughts on later Wittgenstein and quasi-realism’. Iată şi rezumatul:

‘Roughly, there are three main ideas underlying Blackburn’s quasi-realism: that moral statements do not represent facts or properties (1); that such statements „project our sentiments” onto actions – they are best seen as „attitudes” – (2); finally, that moral statements can be said to be true or false, and they can be embedded in conditionals (and in the logical calculus in general) (3). And Wittgenstein seems to agree with all of these. Indeed, he stresses (1) as soon as the Tractatus and there is no reason to think he changed his mind about it. Moreover, he later links the status of ethical terms to those of avowals and gestures of approval and disapproval – as the quasi-realist does at (2). Concerning (3), Wittgenstein prefers to avoid “truth” for non-descriptive statements, but he acknowledges that relying on it is not misguided.

This presentation will defend the proposed juxtaposition from the following two counter-arguments. Firstly, that Wittgenstein abandoned the topic of morals and ethics in his later philosophy, making (2) implausible. Secondly, against (3), that Blackburn advocates for a separate semantics for ethical and moral discourse, and this is thoroughly unwittgensteinan. My claim on the first account will be that Wittgenstein’s idea that „meaning is use” can very well cover the disputed topics. On the second, that Blackburn himself changed his mind about the workings of his project: the stated purpose now is to give a Wittgensteinian perspicuous representation of morals. And Wittgenstein’s views about truth not only confirm Blackburn’s (3) but can enrich it greatly.’

Conferința se va desfășura ȋn limba engleză luni, 5 aprilie, orele 18-20. Un link de conectare via Meet va fi distribuit cu câteva minute înainte tuturor celor ce își indică dorința de participare scriind la adresa andrei.marasoiu@filosofie.unibuc.ro. Prezentarea va fi ȋnregistrată şi va fi disponibilă pe YouTube ȋn perioada următoare.

Mai multe detalii sunt disponibile prin anunțul de pe pagina Facebook a seminarului: https://www.facebook.com/Seminarul-Departamentului-de-Filosofie-Teoretica-UniBuc-285279685738329

CfP: “SAFEGUARDING LIFE”: CULTURAL AND BIOPOLITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON PATRIMONY.

SAFEGUARDING LIFE”: CULTURAL AND BIOPOLITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON PATRIMONY.

CALL FOR PAPERS

THE FIRST EDITION.

 HOSPITALS-MONUMENTS AS (IN)TANGIBLE FORMS OF CULTURAL HERITAGE AT THE BLACK SEA

EXTENDED DEADLINE: APRIL 10, 2021.

CONTEXT

Increasing the regional attractiveness of the states across the Black Sea has never been prospected as a feasible project that might have been conceived by cultural and medical tools. Whenever experts attempt to identify new and sustainable cultural routes in the Black Sea by relating transnational elements across the Black Sea countries, the role of the hospitals placed into monumental buildings of cultural heritage, as well as the capacity of related intangible forms of cultural heritage (resulted from a certain historical and cultural understanding of health and standards for the quality of life across the Black Sea), are ignored or regarded as a peripheral concern.

Nowadays, representatives of different working groups belonging to the European institutions and commissions responsible for culturally regenerating the Black Sea insist on developing networks of museums, cultural sites or other cultural agencies such as festivals, in order to strengthen the partnership between the states that border this maritime area which needs a powerful and renewed branding.

There is no transparent effort in addressing hospitals that are placed into historical buildings as part of the cultural heritage of the Black Sea, nor any intention of insisting on their potential to be reliable candidates for inscription in the UNESCO’s World Heritage List.

The Black Sea coast is recognized for its balneary potential but health is never addressed, consequently, as a form of cultural capital whose resources and practices correspond, from their material order, to a set of intercultural comprehensive values, inherited rituals and medical knowledge. Such medical rituals lay at the core of local and national “cultures of health” that might be proposed, as well, for inscription in the UNESCO`s Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage

 

TOWARDS A NETWORK OF HOSPITALS-MONUMENTS ACROSS THE BLACK SEA

Relevant examples of hospitals-monuments can be tracked across the Romanian territory.  The Clinical Hospital of Nephrology Dr. Carol Davila, in fact, the only institution in Romania with this profile, is one of the most impressive local buildings made in neoclassical style, inspired by the model proposed by “Ospedale di S. Lazzaro e Medicanti” in Venice. Colțea Hospital, established 300 years ago, was one of the first European medical units with a social-medical mission, finding a similar format in the “Charite” hospitals in Berlin and “Guy” in London. Behind the walls of these monuments, the clinical protocol functions at high standards of excellence and performance, the last-minute medical technology being used without undermining the heritage value of the building. Sometimes, the protocol of medical recovery found correspondent practices on the Black Sea coast, whose waters have been prospected as a cure for rheumatic, nervous and arthritic disorders. As a national example, in Eforie Nord, under the patronage of King Carol I, a health resort sprang up at the end of the 19th century; nowadays, the resort is well known for the curative potential of the sapropelic mud and represents a strategic area of the Romanian Black Sea coast.

In what concerns the possibility to create a network of the hospitals-monuments belonging to the states across the Black Sea, some important historical buildings should be considered for inclusion. One of them is the building of the Russian hospital from the coast of Sevastopol, named after Pirgov on Pavlovsky cape; the city hospital of Krasnodar, built together with a complex of buildings of the poorhouse and a church, in the first part of the 19th century; the former hospital of Kavala during the Balkan wars, currently functioning as the male high school; the old hospital of Izmail, registered as a historical monument, or Museum of Health and Sultan Beyazit II Mosque, from Edirne, built in the XVth century.

On the one hand, history reveals that many of the monumental buildings of these hospitals have initially been designed and intended for military, ecclesiastical or educational functions, being subsequently converted and adapted to the medical protocol.  On the other hand, the buildings of cultural heritage that could not be preserved or restored according to the clinical protocol, changed their function, being adapted to educational or commercial spaces. In the process of conversion, the cultural identity and memory of the heritage buildings were compromised or lost, along with the correspondent elements of intangible cultural heritage. Therefore, it is urgent to develop conservation and restoration policies that pay equal attention to the dynamics and the functionality of these monuments throughout history, without neglecting the local or regional priorities of safeguarding such buildings of cultural heritage.

Addressing the right concern to such institutions that perform both tangible and intangible forms of heritage following cultural patterns specific to the Black Sea means healing this area from its one of its most benign diseases: a political, economic and educational underestimation of health as a fertile, cultural resource.

 

OBJECTIVES

  1. To address health as a form of cultural capital.
  2. To create an international platform of dialogue and cooperation for experts from different sectors of culture in order to develop European standards for evaluating the buildings of cultural heritage in which historical hospitals are placed.
  3. To evaluate the (bio)political implications of safeguarding hospitals-monuments.

ESTIMATED OUTCOMES

  • To create a network of the hospitals-monuments belonging to the states across the Black Sea.
  • To identify historical buildings of such hospitals-monuments that can be proposed for inscription on UNESCO’s World Heritage List.
  • To identify different medical practices and rituals inspired by the natural and balneary potential of the states across the Black Sea that developed “cultures of health” and are suitable to be recommended for inscription on the Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage.
  • To develop international cultural policies of safeguarding the historical buildings that belong to the hospitals evaluated as cultural heritage monuments.

CALL FOR PAPERS

We invite scholars to submit their valuable contribution to this conference. Philosophical, cultural and political approaches are encouraged. Abstracts (max. 350 words) and a short professional biography (400 words) are welcomed no later than March 31 2021 April 10, 2021. Authors can submit applications to the following address: oana.serban@filosofie.unibuc.ro.

The conference will be held – depending on the conditions of the pandemic – at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, between April 23-24, 2021. Alternatively, if the pandemic situation does not allow a public event, the conference will be organized online.

This conference is organized by CCIIF – The Research Center for the History of Philosophy & CSRB – The Center for the Study of Rationality and Beliefs (FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST).

 

ACADEMIC NETWORKING

Scholars that will take part to this event will be asked about their disposal to join a research network devoted to the analysis of tangible and intangible forms of cultural heritage inspired by health as form of cultural capital across Europe. Potential mechanisms for financing this research will be discussed after the conference with those interested in developing such a project.

For any additional information please do not hesitate to contact us by email:

Coordinator, PhD. Oana Șerban, oana.serban@filosofie.unibuc.ro

Teaching assistant, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Philosophy

Postdoctoral Fellow – ISD Bucharest