Conferentiar-Professor dr. Gabriel Vacariu (the webpage is in English)
Conf.univ.dr. Gabriel Vacariu este doctor al University of New South Wales (Sydney, Australia) din anul 2008 cu o teză despre Lumile Epistemologic Diferite. Contribuţia sa principală constă în dezvoltarea unei teorii complexe care oferă răspunsuri la problema minte-corp, cu aplicaţii specifice la biologie şi mecanica cuantică. Principalele rezultate ale cercetării au fost sintetizate recent în cartea sa din 2016, Illusions of Human Thinking (Springer Verlag). Gabriel Vacariu predă la Facultatea de Filosofie din 1997. În prezent, ţine cursuri de Filosofia minţii şi a ştiinţei cogniţiei, Teoria cunoaşterii ştiinţifice, precum şi Filosofie şi film.
- The theory of scientific knowledge (Teoria cunoasterii stiintifice) an III, semestrul 1 Teoretica,
- Philosophy of mind and cognitive science (Filosofia mintii si a stiintei cognitiei) anul II, semestrul 1
- Filosofie și film, optional, semestrul II (despre “”Solaris”, clip aici: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12tmpUE0970&index=5&list=PLeCzXaJUD1YRTJu2ze076u6TpePM-Wi9g)
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” (Mahatma Gandhi)
In my case: “First they ignore me, then either they plagiarize my ideas or they laugh at me, then they fight me, then I win.”
My books 2008-2016: 8 books in 8 years. The circle of knowledge [science (physics, cognitive neuroscience) + philosophy] is closed!
[For people who have plagiarized my ideas (so many people, from so many domains, from so many countries): you knew I have been Beethoven of human knowledge. About those who laugh: “Don’t worry, I know you’ll never understand it.” (Wittgenstein in 1929, Cambridge, toward the members of his PhD committee, Russell and Moore.)]
My personal webpages: https://plus.google.com/+GabrielVacariu/posts
“The EDWs are not for today, the place of the remnants of the last century, but for tomorrow, the time of new contretemps! With my EDWs perspective, I showed that the world does not exist so, except Darwin’s evolution, Boltzmann’s entropy and Einstein’s relativity, all the other “great theories” were wrong: all approaches in philosophy (of mind), everything in cognitive neuroscience (in my books from 2012 and 2014, I proved this “science” is a pseudo-science), quantum mechanics (all its alternatives are wrong), all definitions of life in biology, God and infinity cannot exist (simply, human mind inventions), etc. I replaced all these wrong theories and approaches with my EDWs perspective, the new paradigm of thinking. More than 90% of my works has been dedicated to particular sciences and not to contemporary ‘philosophy’ (see my first five books below). Because I have created the Zeitgeist of 21st Century (philosophy, physics, cognitive neuroscience, etc.), many people from many domains (physics (many areas), cognitive neuroscience and philosophy (many areas)) from many countries have already plagiarized many of my ideas! (see below.) I discover more and more of such individuals, but I am not worry: history does not forgive people who plagiarize my ideas.” Gabriel Vacariu
“Vacariu advances a novel and challenging perspective from which to view modern sciences ranging from physics to cognitive neuroscience. At its core is the perspective of epistemologically different worlds. On Vacariu’s analysis, entities such as mental and physical phenomena, which many of us struggle to relate, do not belong to the same world-indeed, that world does not exist! This book is filled with probing discussions that will challenge nearly everyone.” William Bechtel, Distinguished Professor Department of Philosophy, Center for Circadian Biology, and Interdisciplinary Program in Cognitive Science University of California, San Diego (USA)
“This is novel and innovative work. It is philosophy in the grand synoptic style – influenced and aware of contemporary science, but not beholden to it. Epistemologically different worlds may be a tool for untying many current philosophical knots.” John Bickle, Philosophy and Religion, Mississippi State University (USA)
“Gabriel Vacariu tackles a long standing assumption of Western thought – that there is only one world. Through a series of ingenious arguments the author shows that by making used of the distinctness of observational conditions, the pretensions of neuroscience to unify psychology is deeply flawed. This is a bold project and the author brings not only a high degree of philosophical sophistication to the task, but also a wide and deep knowledge of various sciences which inform his analysis of the many forms taken by the Unitarian claim.” Rom Harre, Emeritus Fellow, Linacre College, Oxford (Great Britain) Distinguished Research Professor Georgetown University, Washington DC (USA)
“Here at last is the condensed version of Gabriel Vacariu’s startling view of epistemologically different worlds and its application to a range of both traditional and contemporary philosophical problems. If Vacariu is right, this work represents a Copernican shift in our understanding of what we took to be ourselves and the world about us.” Philip Cam, Philosophy, University of New South Wales (Sydney, Australia)
“The idea of epistemologically different worlds can generate a new approach not only to the mind-body problem but also to many other fields of philosophical theorizing, from general ontology to more specific problems in the philosophy of special sciences.” Ilie Parvu, Philosophy, University of Bucharest (Romania)
“The epistemologically different worlds perspective will sure shake the world of science in not too distant future.” Mohsen Aghaei, Kish Institute of Science and Technology (Tehran, Iran)
“Gabriel, personal development like you have exhibited is the sign of a fine mind. Congratulations.” (William R. Uttal, Professor Emeritus (Engineering) at Arizona State University and Professor Emeritus (Psychology) at the University of Michigan, USA)
At a high-school from Portugal, at one of his lectures (a week in November 2015), Manuel Jose, professor of philosophy, thought his students about my EDWs perspective! (He wrote me about this event.)
Parts of my book “Epistemologically Different Worlds” (2008) will be translated by Hichem Messaoudi, Institution University of Tunis, (Tunisia)
I should receive Noble prize for Physics and Biology (i.e., cognitive (neuro)science) since I changed everything in these particular sciences. However, because I am Romanian: the process of my ideas being plagiarized will continue + of course, I will not receive Nobel. However, you the reader don’t forget: with MY EDWs, I have already changed everything… It has been the greatest change in the history of human thinking (philosophy and the main particular sciences). So many people (from many domains, from many countries) have plagiarized so many of my ideas because the EDWs perspective have already been representing the Zeitgeist of 21st Century!
Bad news for people who have plagiarized my ideas: My book on a bibliography (“This work is free only for personal and classroom use. Professor Joseph Vaisman Department of Computer Science and Engineering, NYU-Poly”) with some great philosophers. Quite long list, but there are many different sections. At “Epistemology”, there are 5 books. The first book is my Springer book!
Contact: gvacariu [at] yahoo.com
- NEW: (June 2016), Gabriel Vacariu si Mihai Vacariu, Dark matter and dark energy, space and time, and other pseudo-notions in cosmology, Datagroup on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/MATTER-ENERGY-SPACE-PSEUDO-NOTIONS-COSMOLOGY-ebook/dp/B01HS025O8/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1467292740&sr=8-2&keywords=gabriel+vacariu#navbar
Dark matter and dark energy. Two notions that have troubled cosmologists for a long time. Why? Because they don’t have a “satisfactory” definition, and nobody can identify the “matter” or “forces” that govern them. Currently, we can only deduce the existence of these two notions from the strange movement of the galaxies and the manner they move away from one another, with increasing speed. However, these are not the only mysteries that cosmology cannot yet explain. What happened before the Big Bang? Is the universe still expanding (cosmic inflation)? What is the relation between the theory of relativity and the laws of quantum mechanics? What if the answers to all these questions were far more accessible than researchers thought? What if the real “culprit” for their absence was in fact the framework used by cosmologists, a framework that involves the existence of space and time? With the help of the Epistemologically Different Worlds paradigm, Gabriel and Mihai Vacariu aim to offer an answer to all these questions and many others.
- Conclusion of this book, Conclusion (2016) Vacariu and Vacariu ‘Dark matter…’
- With this book I closed the circle of scientific “knowledge”. The game is over! With this and the other books, I have “solved” all great problems (pseudo-problems, in reality) in physics, cognitive neuroscience and philosophy of the last 100 years. Many people have plagiarized my ideas from the other books. Other people will plagiarize the ideas from this book.
- [In Romanian, a much shorter version: Materie intunecata si energie intunecata, spatiu si timp, si alte pseudo-notiuni in cosmologie, Datagroup at http://www.edituradatagroup.ro/produs/materia-intunecata-si-energia-intunecata-spatiul-si-timpul-si-alte-pseudo-notiuni-in-cosmologie/]
- For those who will plagiarize my ideas from this book: https://www.amazon.co.jp/MATTER-ENERGY-PSEUDO-NOTIONS-COSMOLOGY-English-ebook/dp/B01HS025O8 it is on Amazon Japan…
- NEW: (June 2016) Gabriel Vacariu si Mihai Vacariu (June, 2016), Sinele – O lume epistemologica, Datagroup [Self – An epistemological world]
- (September 2015) “God cannot even exist!” [Below, just above section “Articles”]
- Springer (2016, English and German): Illusions of Human Thinking: on concepts of Mind, Reality, and Universe in Psychology, Neuroscience and Physics [In German: Die Relativität von „Welt“ – Wie Pseudoprobleme in den Neurowissenschaften, der Psychologie und der Quantenphysik durch EDWs zu vermeiden sind, “Edition Centaurus Psychologie” http://www.springer.com/series/13754]
- [My book published at Springer – the best ever written – is the worst nightmare for those who have plagiarized my ideas, so many people from many domains and many countries. Incredible, many people continue plagiarizing my ideas!]
The book illustrates that the traditional philosophical concept of the “Universe”, the “World” has led to anomalies and paradoxes in the realm of knowledge. The author replaces this notion by the EDWs perspective, i.e. a new axiomatic hyperontological framework of Epistemologically Different Worlds” (EDWs). Thus it becomes possible to find a more appropriate approach to different branches of science, such as cognitive neuroscience, physics, biology and the philosophy of mind. The consequences are a better understanding of the mind-body problem, quantum physics non-locality or entanglement, the measurement problem, Einstein’s theory of relativity and the binding problem in cognitive neuroscience.
This book is a relative short version of my Epistemologically Different Worlds (EDWs) perspective (Chapter 1, the non-living entities (objects) that belong to EDWs; Chapter 2, the living beings (each living being is an EW); Chapter 3, the general view of the EDWs perspective) and its main applications to the main philosophical and scientific areas: Chapter 4, philosophy of mind (Descartes’ dualism, levels, reductionism and emergence, qualia, Kant and the “I”); Chapter 5, cognitive science (computationalism and dynamical systems, declarative-procedural, accessible-inaccessible, conscious-unconscious, conceptual- sensorimotor, symbolic-subsymbolic, and explicit-implicit, levels, representations, bidirectionality, threshold etc.); Chapter 6, cognitive neuroscience (optimism and its amazing results (Gallant’s laboratory) and skepticism (Uttal, Raichle’s “default network”), the localization problem, the binding problems (the main approach, oscillations or synchrony theory), multisensory integration, perception and object recognition); Chapter 7 biology (life and the organism/cell); Chapter 8, physics (Einstein’s theory of special and general relativity, quantum mechanics (non-locality or entanglement, the measurement problem, superposition), the relationship between these two theories). In the conclusion, I will explain why I consider that scientists from cognitive (neuro)science, biology and physics need to change the framework within which they work (the unicorn world) with the new “Weltanschauung”, the EDWs perspective.[On Internet about this book
“Illusions of Human Thinking” es la idea del genio del autor Gabriel Vacariu publicado el 2015-10-19 al género del libro Philosophy que se llevará a su imaginación y añadir perspicacia. … Autor Gabriel Vacariu es fantástico en la organización de todos los detalles de los contenidos del libro que tiene la cantidad de papel tanto como 188 es el publicado por un libro confiable y bien conocido de Springer.
“Illusions of Human Thinking” is the idea of genius author Gabriel Vacariu published on 19.10.2015 the genre of the book Philosophy that will take your imagination and add insight. … Author Gabriel Vacariu is fantastic in organizing all the details of the contents of the book that has the amount of paper as much as 188 is published by a reliable and well-known publishing book Springer.]
- My brother and I have written a book about “Dark matter, dark energy, space and time and other pseudo-notions in cosmology”: it is about the Universe, space and time, “before” Big Bang and inflation, dark matter and dark energy, and the “relationship” between Einstein’s theory of relativity and quantum mechanics (“theory of everything”) within the EDWs perspective. The content is here Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu (2016) Dark matter, dark energy and other pseudo-notions in cosmology and here the Bibliography of book ‘Dark matter, dark energy and other pseudo-notions in cosmology’. A short version (in Romanian) with the main ideas has appeared in June 2016 (check on Amazon.com).
- About dark matter and dark energy, for those who have already plagiarized these ideas (and other who will plagiarize them; you don’t need to read my works, the ideas are already here): I wrote these ideas about DARK MATTER and DARK ENERGY long time ago: (2007) Article “Kant, philosophy in the last 100 years and an epistemologically different worlds perspective”: “I want to briefly analyse a Ptolemaic epicycle constructed among others within the unicorn-world in contemporary physics. It is about dark matter and dark energy. Let us consider some EDWs: at least one micro-EW (with microparticles and their interactions), macro-EW (with microparticles like tables, stones, individual planets and their E interactions), galaxy-EW (with galaxies and their E interactions). From an EDWs perspective, the galaxies seem to be E entities that are different then the tables, stones and individual planets. In the same way as an electron does not exist in the macro-EW, a planet does not exist in the galaxy-EW. Between galaxies, probably there are certain E interactions (E laws) that are different then the E laws between individual planets, stones and tables. Within the unicorn-world, at ‘macro-level’, dominated by the macroscopic laws, for solving the anomaly that the “universe” expands faster and faster (i.e., the distances between the galaxies increase faster and faster) we invented such empty notions like dark matter and dark energy. Obviously, there are other EWs then those I mentioned above. The existence of EDWs does not depend on our conditions of observation but on the interactions between ED entities. With new tools of observation, we discover (we do not create) new EWs. To answer the question, “How many EDWs exist?”, we need heuristic and scientific methods. Therefore, this is a scientific and not philosophical problem. However, following Friedman (with his meta-paradigms) we can now return, with the EDWs perspective, to the long forgotten image of philosophy that was guiding the science.” (p. 175) Books (2008): “We can say the same thing about the galaxies and the space beteen them. Dark matter and energy would be the same thing as the space between the electrons and protons. I believe that we can understand the expansion of the galaxies only if we apply the EDWs and transform the galaxies and the space between them into another, yet unknow, EW. In this way, we have to think of a new force from a new EW that produces the expansion of galaxies. Dark energy and dark matter are just pseudo-notions within the unicorn-world.” (p. 359) (2010): “As Vacariu mentioned in (2008), the same alternative is for dark matter and dark energy. These dark phenomena correspond to certain entities/phenomena that belong to another EW. We see only the phenomena that correspond to such entities/processes. We leave the physicists trying to grasp the possible phenomena that correspond to what we call “dark matter and energy”, a very hot actual Ptolemaic epicycle. The helpful analogy is the nonlocality from quantum mechanics that is a problem because of inserting within the unicorn-world both the waves and the particles. Within the unicorn-world, because of the “nonlocality”, Einstein’s principle of light has been under question by some physicist. In Vacariu (2008), it is showed that the principle is correct, only the correspondence between the particles and the wave represents the nonlocality. So, the certain correspondences can reflect phenomena that seem to ignore well accepted physical laws. Identifying to which EDWs belong to those phenomena and their correspondences, we avoid contradicting such laws. The question is “What phenomena from an EW correspond to the galaxies and their increasing speed that belong to the macro-EW?”” (p. 292) (2011): “For instance, it is believed that the time immediately after Big Bang ran much faster than the actual time of the ‘Universe’, few seconds being equivalent to millions/billions of years. For me, this idea is an amazing Ptolemaic epicycle. With the EDWs, we replace this extraordinary expansion of the ‘universe’ with the correspondence between certain phenomena that belong to EDWs. The matter that appeared in few seconds is nothing more than spontaneous appearance from hyper-nothing that corresponds to something from the pre-Big-Bang-EW. The dark matter and the dark energy, the infinities in physical phenomena or even the black holes are other Ptolemaic epicycles created by the human scientific imagination! These elements just correspond to some phenomena that belong to other EDWs. (About these notions and the perspective of EDWs, see VACARIU and VACARIU 2010)” (p. 50) Springer’s book (2016): “The relationship between dark energy/matter and galaxies is quite similar to the relationship between microparticles and waves. It has to be a correspondence between the accelerating galaxies and some phenomena from an EDW than the macro-EW of galaxies, planets, etc. The black holes from our macro-EW correspond to some phenomena that belong to an EDW. Therefore, black holes are not the gate toward another world. Some physicists (for instance Krauss in his book „A universe from nothing“, 2012) consider that the universe appeared from nothing. From an EDWs perspective, the universe appeared from hypernothing. (See my future work on this topic and other related topics such as the Big Bang, dark matter and dark energy, inflation, etc.)”
- Parts of my book Epistemologically Different Worlds (2008) will be translated by Hichem Messaoudi, Institution University of Tunis, (Tunisia)
- (September 2015) “God cannot even exist!”(the paper is here (2015) Vacariu ‘God-cannot-even-exist’)
- Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu (published August 2015), “Is Cognitive Neuroscience a pseudo-science?“, Datagroup publishing house.
Is cognitive neuroscience a pseudoscience?, Gabriel Vacariu, Mihai Vacariu – Amazon.com
This book is a synthesis of all our works on cognitive neuroscience since 2008 to the present day. We deal with a general view about this “science”, with its main topics (fMRI and EEG, localization, the binding problem, perceptual processing, multisensory integration, etc.) which none has been solved after many years of research. Therefore, our conclusion is that these problems are in fact pseudo-problems and cognitive neuroscience is a pseudo-science.
- The “BOOK OF BOOKS” (published in Romanian, published already in November 2014 in Romanian): Gabriel Vacariu (2014) Epistemologically different worlds – The new paradigm of thinking, Datagroup int srl. This book is a relative short version of my EDWs perspective and its main applications to the main philosophical and scientific areas: philosophy of mind, cognitive (neuro)science, biology and physics (quantum mechanics, Einstein’s theory of relativity). It will be also published in English and German languages (printed and ePub). (See the Content here)
On the second cover of this book, some words about this book from William Bechtel (USA), John Bickle (USA), Eliezer Torres (Mexico), Rom Harre (Great Britain and USA), Ilie Parvu (Romania), Mohsen Aghaei (Iran), and Philip Cam (Australia) (copertile in limba romana)
- My book “Epistemologically different worlds” (2008) have been mentioned on Wikipedia.org webpage: “Counterfactual definiteness” (Categories: “Quantum measurement”) at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_definiteness (the same article at http://encyclopine.org/en/Counterfactual_definiteness; www.minds.com/; www.mashpedia.com; www.redorblue.tk/; enc.tfode.com/; nichecreator.com/; epo.wikitrans.net/; 4cc.ir/docs/; www.tutorgigpedia.com; sciencewise.info/; www.biblicalwritings.com; si.infogin.com/, etc.); http://www.gutenberg.us/articles/counterfactual_definiteness
- The first paragraph of this article indicates:
“Counterfactual definiteness (CFD) means that the output of a system can, in principle, be calculated by using an explicit formula y = f(x). Although the aspects of the universe that can adequately be described by classical physics are compatible with counterfactual definiteness, those aspects of the universe that can only be adequately modelled or described by quantum mechanics are not in all cases compatible with counterfactual definiteness. ” (Footnote : “Gabriel Vacariu, “Epistemologically Different Worlds,” Editura Universitãtii din bucuresti, 2008, ISBN 978-973-737-442-4 p. 331″)
- Some people (USA) introduced some of my works in the “Seminar Bibliography”
- I would like to thank you very much to Robert T Craig (student Physics, MIT) for helping me in creating my page on wordpress.com: https://gabrielvacariu.wordpress.com/
The EDWs perspective is the greatest challenge in the history of human thinking. With my EDWs perspective (2002, 2005, 2008, 2010), I showed that the main greatest problems from science and philosophy are pseudo-problems. These pseudo-problems are:
- The mind-brain problem: in philosophy since Descartes, in cognitive science since this particular science appeared, then a particular science has been invented in the 70’s for solving it directly: cognitive neuroscience.
- The life-organism/cell problem: in biology there have been many particular definitions of “life” but nobody could identify the relationship between life and the organism/cell.
- The relationship between wave and particle in quantum mechanics: in physics, this problem has not been solved since its appearance (Young’s experiment!). It remains one of the greatest mysteries of quantum mechanics.
- The relationship between microparticles and macroparticles: in physics, this problem pushed the scientists to try to unify Einstein’s theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics. The results of this unification were unsuccessful.
However, after from 2011, some people published unbelievable similar ideas to my ideas from 2005 and 2008! I claim “unbelievable” because all these ideas require a new framework of thinking and I have been the only one who discovered the existence of EDWs! During more than 2500 years, people have worked within the wrong framework, the world/universe or as I called, the “unicorn world”. Therefore, statistically, it is impossible two persons (in fact, so many!) to publish the same new framework or the same ideas within the same five-seven years! Really impossible… (Don’t forget the world of Internet today: my first five books have been free on Internet immediately after each being published!)
- The UNBELIEVABLE similarities between my ideas (philosophy, philosophy of mind, cognitive neuroscience, quantum mechanics, and physics, mainly from 2005 to 2008) and the ideas of other people (from 2011 to 2015) (updated April 2016): Content: Introduction: The EDWs perspective in my article from 2005 and my book from 2008; Chapter 1 Philosophy (of mind): Did David Ludwig (2015, Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands) plagiarize MANY of my ideas?; Chapter 2 Philosophy: Did Markus Gabriel plagiarize (2013, Department of Philosophy, Bonn University, Germany) my ideas?; Chapter 3 Cognitive Neuroscience: Did Georg Northoff (2011-214, Psychoanalysis, Institute of Mental Health Research, Canada) plagiarize my ideas?; Chapter 4 Quantum mechanics: The UNBELIEVABLE similarities between my ideas and Radu Ionicioiu (physics, University of Bucharest, Romania) and Daniel R. Terno’s ideas (2011) (physics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia); Chapter 5 Cognitive neuroscience: The unbelievable similarities between my ideas and Kalina Diego Cosmelli, Legrand Dorothée and Thompson Evan’s ideas (2011, USA); Chapter 6 Quantum mechanics: Quite similar idea between my idea (2007, 2008, etc.) and Pikovski et al. (June 2015) regarding the Schrodinger’s cat’s interactions with its environment (the gravitation of Earth) (both entities being macro-objects); Chapter 7 Cosmology: Similar idea to my ideas from 2011, 2014 in Elisabetta Caffau (2015, Center for Astronomy at the University of Heidelberg and the Paris Observatory) regarding the appearance of Big Bang in many places; Chapter 8 Physics: Did Wolfram Schommers (2015, University of Texas at Arlington, USA & Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany) plagiarize my ideas?; Chapter 9 Ontology: The unbelievable similarities between my ideas (2002, 2005, 2008) and Andrew Newman’s ideas (University of Nebraska, at Omaha, USA) (2013) Chapter 10 (2015) Unbelievable similarities between my ideas (2002, 2005, 2008) and Alexey Alyushin (2010) (Moscow, Russia); Chapter 11 (2016) Dylan H. Mahler, Lee Rozema, Kent Fisher, Lydia Vermeyden, Kevin J. Resch, Howard M. Wiseman, and Aephraim Steinberg (2016), “Experimental nonlocal and surreal Bohmian trajectories”, Science Advances, Vol 2 No 2. (05 February 2016); Chapter 12 Quantum mechanics: Unbelievable similarities between my EDWs and Bill Poirier’s ‘Many Interacting Worlds’ (2016); Conclusion (the document here: updated-July-2016-Gabriel-Vacariu-The-UNBELIEVABLE-similarities-2
- There are many people who plagiarized my ideas! “I don’t care that they stole my idea . . I care that they don’t have any of their own” (Nikola Tesla)
- More details about these unbelievable similarities and my commentaries see my webpages: https://plus.google.com/+GabrielVacariu/posts http://philpapers.org/profile/8792; https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gabriel_Vacariu; https://unibuc.academia.edu/GabrielVacariu/Analytics#/documents
- Three records recording the number of (1) people who plagiarized my ideas (2) their fields (philosophy, physics, cognitive neuroscience, cosmology, ontology) and topics (so many) (3) their countries (Germany, USA, Netherlands, Russia, Romania, Australia, and Canada). Indeed, for me, the “world” has become very small!
- Very important: my paper from Synthese (2005) about the EDWs was on the first place most downloaded paper of that journal several months!! I expected many people will investigate my EDWs… Surprisingly, almost nobody wrote something about my EDWs. But many people have plagiarized my ideas!!!
- I should receive Noble prize for Physics and Biology (i.e., cognitive (neuro)science) since I changed everything in these particular sciences. However, because I am Romanian: the process of my ideas being plagiarized will continue + of course, I will not receive Nobel. However, you the reader don’t forget: with MY EDWs, I have already changed everything… It has been the greatest change in the history of human thinking (philosophy and the main particular sciences). So many people (from many domains, from many countries) have plagiarized so many of my ideas because the EDWs perspective have already been representing the Zeitgeist of 21st Century!
- It was impossible two persons to discover the EDWs in the same decade! Without the EDWs foundation, not any idea from my books could have been created. Therefore, it would be impossible other person to discover any of my important idea! And I have so many essential ideas (of many fields and particular sciences/philosophy) in my books…
- WARNING for those who have plagiarized my ideas: one of my works has already been included in the Content of a Course (Psychology, Columbia Southern University, USA (https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/CSU_Content/Courses/General_Studies/PSY/PSy3019/13F/Percourse.pdf) + My book published at Springer is on a bibliography (“This work is free only for personal and classroom use. Professor Joseph Vaisman Department of Computer Science and Engineering, NYU-Poly”) with some great philosophers. Quite long list, but there are many different sections. At “Epistemology”, there are 5 books. The first book is my book!
- (04.12.2013) Presentation “The world vs. epistemologically different worlds”, Department of Philosophy, Bucharest University. See this presentation on Youtube: Part 1 and Part 2.In this clip, I present my Epistemologically Different Worlds (EDWs) perspective. In other works (2005, 2008, 2011, 2012), I tried to illustrate that the greatest illusion of human knowledge surviving from the oldest times is the notion of „world”, of „uni-verse” or as he called it, the „unicorn world”. The main mistake that led to the creation of the unicorn world is that we, the human beings, believed (consciously or not) that we were the only observers of the “world”. As a result, Gods, all beings (humans with their mind, brains and bodies, and plants, cells, microbes, animals) and all objects (tables, stones and planets, electrons, waves and fields) have been placed within the same world, the unique world, the uni-verse. I replace the “world” with EDWs. The tables (and all macro-objects) belong to the same EW (macro-EW), the electrons and protons belong to micro-EW, while the mind is an EW, the brain and the body or the wave and the microparticle, organism and life belong to (or are) EDWs. All great philosophical problems (mind-brain problem) and all quantum problems (entanglement, non-locality, etc.) are pseudo-problems. (For all these pseudo-problems, see my other works at this page) See also this pdf text.
Editor of issues
(2013) Gabriel Vacaru and Mihai Vacariu (eds.), “The mind-body problem in cognitive neuroscience”, Philosophia Scientiae 17/2 (Nancy-Universite/France). Authors of this issue: William Bechtel, Rolls T. Edmund, Cees van Leeuwen, Kari Theurer and John Bickle, Bernard Andrieu, Corey Maley and Gualtiero Piccinini, Paula Droege, and Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu. Abstracts of all articles (pdf)
(2001) M. Vacariu, E. T. Rolls, G. Vacariu, (eds), “Representations”, Synthese 129/2 (Kluwer, Boston) (ISI) Authors of this issue: Edmund T. Rolls (Oxford University); Kim Plunkett (Oxford University); Peter Mcleod (Oxford University), David Plaut and Tim Shallice; K. Rantala (University of Tampere); Michael Wheeler (Oxford University); Radu Bogdan (Tulaine University); Ilie Parvu (Bucharest University); Gabriel Vacariu, Dalia Terhesiu and Mihai Vacariu (http://www.springerlink.com/content/w4k0qhywlvv4/?p=a343fc99dadd48209134de
|(2013) Philosophia Scientiae 17/2 (France)
(cover and content PDF)
|(2001) Synthese 129/2 (USA, Springer)
(covers and content PDF)
- (2016 English and Germany) Gabriel Vacariu – Illusions of Human Thinking: on concepts of Mind, Reality, and Universe in Psychology, Neuroscience and Physics, Springer Publishing Company [A very bad news for people who plagiarize my ideas…]
- (2014) “More troubles with cognitive neuroscience. Einstein’s theory of relativity and the hyperverse” (125,000 words) University of Bucharest Press (Full text PDF)
In this book, I points out more troubles with cognitive neuroscience: spatial cognition, the best achievements in cognitive neuroscience in the last 3 years (the fMRI experiments of Gallant’s team), multisensory integration, endogenous brain activity, default network, and the relationship between micro-neuronal level, macro-neuronal level, oscillations and cognition. In the book “Cognitive neuroscience versus epistemologically different worlds” (2012), I investigated some important problems of cognitive neuroscience. (see below) The general conclusion of these two works is that cognitive neuroscience is a pseudo-science. In the last chapter of this book (2014), with my EDWs perspective, I furnish the (hyper)ontological status of Einstein’s (special and general) theory of relativity. (Appendix: “Did Markus Gabriel (Bonn University) plagiarize my ideas?”)
● (2012) “Cognitive neuroscience versus epistemologically different worlds”, University of Bucharest Press, 356 pages, 120,000 words. (full text PDF)
From the “epistemologically different worlds” perspective, I analyze the status of cognitive neuroscience today. I investigate the main actual topics in cognitive neuroscience: localization and the brain imaging, the binding problem (Treisman’s feature integration theory and synchronized oscillations approach), differentation and integration, optimism versus skepticism approaches, perception and object recognition, space and the mind, crossmodal interactions, and the holistic view against localization. The conclusion is that this “science” has “No ontology landscape” and, therefore, cognitive neuroscience is a pseudo-science.
● (2011) “Being and the Hypervese” (In English), University of Bucharest Press, 50,000 words. Full text (PDF) and Abstract (DOCX)
It is about the pure theoretical system of EDWs (almost without applications to any particular sciences – cognitive science, physics or biology). I constructed the conditions of the possibility for any EDWs (that exist or possible to exist) given by 13 propositions that represent the axiomatic-hyperontological framework in 13 parts. In general, these propositions refer to the abstract entities andtheir interactions. Being is the only entity that is an epistemological world. In this short book, I deal with the hyperontology of the hyperverse, no more or less than “pure philosophy”.
● (2010) Vacariu, Gabriel and Vacariu, Mihai: “Mind, Life and Matter in the Hyperverse”, (PDF, published version, in English), University of Bucharest Press, 95,000 words.
Hyperverse (epistemologically different worlds) vs. “unicorn world” and the application of the EDWs perspective to: neuroscience (Llinas) and cognitive neuroscience (Frith), robotics (Andy Clark and Noe), Descartes’ ghost (Grush and Michael Wheleer), Bechtel’s mechanisms, Bickle’s molecules and cells, Kauffman’s “complexity” in biology, physics (particles and waves, gravity and Einstein, quantum mechanics, the superstring theory or hyperspace vs. the hyperverse).
● (2008) Epistemologically Different Worlds,(published version, PDF, in English) University of Bucharest Press,
Descartes, Kant, “epistemologically different worlds” perspective and its applications to: (1) philosophy of mind (levels, reductionism, emergence, qualia, the “I”, mental causation, supervenience); (2) cognitive science (computationalism, connectionism, dynamical system approach, robotics, representation, levels, declarative-procedural, accessible-inaccessible, conscious-unconscious, conceptual-sensorimotor, symbolic-subsymbolic, and explicit-implicit knowledge, thresholds, self-organization, etc.) (3) philosophy (logical positivism, Carnap’s linguistic frameworks, Quine, Goodman, Putnam, Friedman) (4) physics (quantum mechanics: superposition, entanglement, nonlocality and nonseparability, levels, collapse, measurement problem, Young’s experiment and Wheelers’ delayed-choice experiment, Feynman’s “sum over histories” framework, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, Schrödinger’s cat, decoherence and the multiverse approach)
● (2013) Gabriel Vacariu si Gheorghe Ştefanov (editori), Problema minte-creier în neuroştiinţa cogniţiei, Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti (Cuprins si coperta)
- (September 2015) “God cannot even exist!”(the paper is here God cannot even exist!)
Articles published (some ISI and ERIH)
● (June 2013) Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu, “Introduction”, special issue “The mind-brain problem in cognitive neuroscience”, Philosophia Scientiae 17/2 (France)
● (2013) Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu “Troubles with cognitive neuroscience“, Philosophia Scientiae 17/2 (France)
“Abstract: In few words, we present the main actual problems of cognitive neuroscience: the binding problem, localization, differentiation-integration in the brain, the troubles created by the brain imaging, and optimism vs. skepticism in cognitive neuroscience. Surprisingly, even if there are more and more experimental results in recent years, we notice no real hope for solving these troubles in the future. Cognitive neuroscience is a science constructed on ‘correlations’ between mental and neuronal states, mainly furnished by the brain imaging – fMRI of the last two decades. We want to suggest that “correlation” lacks any ontological background. In this context, we have to answer the following question: Is cognitive neuroscience a real science or a kind of ‘new engineering’?”
● (2013) Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu “Cognitive neuroscience: science or engineering?” (in Romanian) in Gabriel Vacariu and Gheorghe Stefanov (eds.) The Problem of mind-brain in cognitive neuroscience, Bucharest University Publishing Company
● (2012), “Localization in cognitive neuroscience: optimism (Bechtel) versus skepticism (Uttal)“, Analele Universitatii din Craiova, Filosofie (pdf)
● (2011) “The synchrony or temporal coding theory (temporal binding)“, Mihai Vacariu and Gabriel Vacariu, Analele Universitatii Bucuresti(pdf)
● (August 2011), “The mind-brain problem today”, Open Journal of Philosophy, (Scientific Research Publishing, US)
● (2010) “Emulators, representations and Descartes’ ghost” (PDF) Mihai Vacariu si Gabriel Vacariu, Analele Universitatii Bucuresti
● (2009) Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu. “Physics and Epistemologically Different Worlds” (PDF), Revue roumaine de philosophie, vol. 53, 2009, nr. 1-2.
● (2009) Gabriel Vacariu, Mihai Vacariu, Leon Zăgrean, “Neurostiinta cognitiei si problema minte-creier” in Eugen Avram(coord.), Creier, Functionalitate, dizabilitate, Editura Universitatii Bucuresti
(in English: “Cognitive Neuroscience and the mind-brain problem”, in Eugen Avram (ed.) Brain, Functionality, Disability, University of Bucharest Press)
● (2008) Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu.”The “I” as an epistemological world” (PDF), Analele Universitatii Bucuresti
● (2007) “Kant, philosophy in the last 100 years and an epistemologically different worlds perspective”(PDF), Revue Roumanie de Philosophie, vol. 51
● (2007) “Perceptual mental states, higher order thoughts, and consciousness“ (PDF), Analele Universitatii Bucuresti
● (2006) “The epistemologically different worlds perspective and some pseudo-notions from quantum mechanics”, Analele Universitatii Bucuresti
● (2005) “Mind, brain and epistemologically different worlds”, in Synthese Review, vol. 143, no. 3 (http://www.springerlink.com/content/m152587261h1/)
● (2004) “Brain, mind and epistemologically different worlds” (PDF), in Revue Roumanie de Philosophie, 48, no.1-2
● (2002) “Reprezentari si concepte”(“Representations and concepts”) (PDF) in Romanian Academy Journal of Philosophy, no. 3-4,
● (2002) Terhesiu D., and Vacariu G. “Brain, mind and the perspective of the observer”(PDF), Revue Roumanie de Philosophie, 46, no.1-2
● (2002) Vacariu, G. and Terhesiu, D. “Brain, mind and the role of the observer”, in Philosophy of Consciousness and Cognitive Science, Angela Botez and Bogdan Popescu (Eds.), Bucharest, Cartea Romaneasca
● (2002) G. Vacariu, M. Vacariu, “In searching for the Absolute”(DOC), series of 3 essays about the aesthetics of Andrei Tarkovsky’s in Timpul (The Time), starting with no.7, July 2002, Iassy, Romania.
● (2001) M. Vacariu, G. Vacariu, E. T. Rolls (Eds), “Representations in the Mind, Representations in the Brain”- introduction to vol. 129, no. 2, Synthese, November 2001, (Kluwer, Boston)
930e961bf7π=74 ) Authors of the articles are: E.T. Rolls (Oxford University), Kim Plunkett (Oxford University), Peter Mcleod (Oxford University)& Shallice & Plaut, K. Rantala (University of Tampere), M. Wheeler, Radu Bogdan (Tulaine University), Ilie Parvu (Bucharest University), G. Vacariu & D. Terhesiu & M. Vacariu
● (2001) G. Vacariu, D. Terhesiu, M. Vacariu, “Towards a very idea of representation” in Synthese, vol. 219, no.2, November 2001, Kluwer, Boston (http://www.springerlink.com/content/w4k0qhywlvv4/?p=a343fc99dadd48209134de
● (1999) I. Toader and G. Vacariu, “Inquieries on Carnap’s Aufbau (II)”(PDF), Revue Roumaine de Philosophie, no. 42-43, Romanian Academy
● (1998) G. Vacariu I. and Toader: “Color similarity in Carnap’s Aufbau ”(PDF), Krisis, vol. 6
● (1997) I. Toader and G. Vacariu, “Inquieries on Carnap’s Aufbau (I)”(PDF), Revue Roumaine de Philosophie, no. 3-4, Romanian Academy
(Except 5 and 10, all my articles are published in English.)
Interviews and quotations
An interview (in Romanian) about my EDWs perspective with Alexandru Valentin Craciun at https://alexandruvalentincraciun.wordpress.com/2015/06/19/de-la-lumea-inorogului-la-lumile-epistemologic-diferite-dialog-cu-prof-conf-dr-gabriel-vacariu-facultatea-de-filosofie-bucuresti/ (or here: De la „Lumea inorogului” la „Lumile Epistemologic Diferite”)
My books and articles are mentioned by different authors in some articles, books or PhD thesis:
● (2015) William R. Uttal, Macroneural Theories in Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychology Press
https://books.google.ro/books?id=zRA-CgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false (William Uttal is one of the greatest cognitive neuroscientists in the world!)
● My Springer’s book (2016) on a bibliography (“This work is free only for personal and classroom use. Professor Joseph Vaisman Department of Computer Science and Engineering, NYU-Poly”) with some great philosophers. Quite long list, but there are many different sections. At “Epistemology”, there are 5 books. The first book is my book!
● (2015) Robert C. Trundle, Integrated Truth and Existential Phenomenology: A Thomistic Response to iconic anti-realists in science, Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands [My book (2014) More troubles with cognitive neuroscience; Einstein’s theory of relativity and the hyperverse is mentioned: the idea about the possibility that cognitive neuroscience is a pseudo-science since correlations between mental and neuronal states do not presuppose any laws proper to science. (p. 20)]
● (2015) Charles-Édouard Niveleau and Alexandre Métraux, “The Bounds of Naturalism: A Plea for Modesty”, Philosophia Scientiæ, 19(3), 2015, 3–21
● About the “epistemologically different worlds” at http://worddomination.com/epistemologically.html
● My EDWs perspective is investigated by Ahmed Kuytov (Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, an article in a Bulgarian journal (2014), pp. 55-60) at http://issuu.com/24756/docs/idei_1-2014/73?e=3480348/7323418 (or here)
● Despre munca mea si neamtul care mi-a plagiat ideile, vezi http://reactii.ro/de-ce-lumea-nu-exista-despre-moartea-inorogului-si-invierea-filozofiei/ (in limba romana)
● (2016) Vlad Paul Mocanu “Does the Epistemologically Different Worlds Approach Become a Solipsist Philosophy at the End?”,Annals of the University of Bucharest, Vol. LXIII, no. 2, 2014 pp. 125 – 138, http://annals.ub-filosofie.ro/index.php/annals/article/view/189
The article Vacariu, Terhesiu, Vacariu (2001)
● Wheeler, Michael, 2005, Reconstructing the Cognitive World – The Next Step, Bradford Book, The MIT Press
● Wheeler, Michael, 2009, “The Problem of Representation”, in Shaun Gallager and Daniel Schmicking (eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Springer
● Scott Freeman (2012), “An engaging nuisance: Weka, flipping and farmers”, PhD thesis Philosophy, Lincoln University, New Zeeland
● Michael Anacker, Marc Breuer, Daniel Cohnitz, Michael Flacke (2003), “Bibliography Zeitschriftenschau”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34: 371–405
● Szabó, Inácio (2008), “Comunidades virtuais de conhecimento: informação e inteligência coletiva no ciberespaço”, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Ciência da Informação, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Informação
● Stefanescu Adina “Reflection on the content and the reference of the Idea of Representation – Reflection on the content and the reference of the Idea of Representation – Review of Vacariu et al.’s “Toward a very idea of representation” (http://protlc.net/reflection-on-the-content-and-the-reference-of-the-idea-of-representation/)
The article Vacariu (2005)
● van der Beek, George (2006), “Representationalism versus Anti-representationalism: constraining the notion of representation”, Master’s thesis at Cognitive Artiﬁcial Intelligence, University of Utrecht
● Tsai, Yao-Ming (Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University), “The Philosophical Outreach and Literary Review of the Mind-Body Topic in Buddhist Studies”
● Lovell-Smith, Hugh David (2009), “A consideration of homeostatic regulation of eating from the perspective of maharishi vedic science”, PhD thesis, University of Auckland, NZ
● Bosnic, Emir (2009), “Física cartesiana e mathesis universalis”, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, PhD thesis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
● Inácio Szabó and Rubens Ribeiro Gonçalves da Silva, (2006) “A construção de conhecimento nas comunidades virtuais do ciberespaço”, Revista da Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação, Spain
● Cai Yaoming (2010) (National Taiwan University Department of Philosophy) “The psychosomatic topic philosophy in Buddhist scholars the tentacles and academic review”, La Well the network editorial department reported
● John Bickle “Introduction”, Synthese (2005). Volume 147, Issue 3
Article (2007) “Kant, philosophy in the last 100 years and an epistemologically different worlds perspective”
● Margit Ruffing (2009), “Kant-Bibliographie 2007”, Kant-Studien issue 4, pp. 427-592
About “Epistemologically different worlds” (2008)
● Adriana Monica Solomon (2009), Revista de Filosofie Analitică, Volumul III, 10, Ianuarie (http://www.srfa.ro/rrfa/pdf/rfa-III-1-publicatii-evenimente.pdf)
● Wikipedia.org: “Counterfactual definiteness” (Categories: “Quantum measurement”) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_definiteness +
+ “Project Gutenberg Self Publishing Press” at http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/counterfactual_definiteness
The article Vacariu (2011)
● Sung Jang Chung (2014), “Parallels between Confucian Philosophy and Quantum Physics”, Open Journal of Philosophy 4, 192-206
● Sung Jang Chung (Morristown-Hamblen Healthcare System, Morristown, USA) (2012), “The Science of Self, Mind and Body”, Open Journal of Philosophy (USA), Vol.2, No.3
● Johnson Final Draft: http://johnson10803.weebly.com/final-draft3.html
● This paper is in a bibliography of a course at Columbia Southern University (USA), Psychology,
Record of tertiary studies
● (January 2008) Ph.D. degree, University of New South Wales, School of Philosophy (Sydney, Australia)
● (2004- 2007) Ph.D. student, University of New South Wales, School of Philosophy (Sydney, Australia); Title: Epistemologically Different Worlds (PDF); EIPRS and UIPA scholarships. The thesis was submitted at Graduate Centre, UNSW on 06.09.2007 and posted on the internet on 21.09.2007 and then on 29.04.2008. The referees of the thesis: John Bickle (University of Cincinnati, USA), Rom Harre (Linacre College, Oxford, UK) and Ilie Parvu (University of Bucharest, Romania)
● (February 2006) Ph.D. degree, University of Bucharest, Department of Philosophy, Chair of Theoretical Philosophy and Logic; Topic: The concept of representation in cognitive science
● (1999-2000) New Bulgarian University, Department of Cognitive Science (Sofia, Bulgaria); Postgraduate Student
● (1996-1997) University of Bucharest, Department of Philosophy (Bucharest, Romania) MA – average: 10 (of max. 10); Master Thesis: Inquires on Carnap’s Aufbau
● (1991-1996) University of Bucharest, Department of Philosophy (Bucharest, Romania)
BA – average: 9.50 (of max. 10); Thesis: Kant and the exact sciences
● (1987-1991) Technical University of Iassy, Department of Computer Science (Iassy, Romania) Undergraduate Student
● (2013) Reviewer at Synthese – An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (USA)
● (2015), Reviewer at MIT Press (USA)
● (May 2013) Jagiellonian University (Krakow, Poland) one month research scholarship within CEEPUS project (international project on Cognitive Science).
● (May 2002) ELTE University (Budapest, Hungary) one month research scholarship within CEEPUS project (international project on Cognitive Science).
● (2002-2003) University of New York, Department of Philosophy (New York, USA) Fulbright Scholarship
● (May 2002) University of Viena, Department of Philosophy (Vienna, Austria) Scholarship offered by CEEPUS project-an international project on Cognitive Science
● (January 2002) Washington University, Department of Philosophy (Saint Louis, USA); Scholarship offered by CNCSIS project
● (1998-1999) University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology (Oxford, Great Britain) Soros Scholarship; Supervisors: Prof. Martin Davies and Prof. Peter McLeod; Adviser: Prof. E. T. Rolls
● Since 2009, Lecturer Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Bucharest (Bucharest, Romania)
● (2009-2010) I hold a course on Philosophy of Cognitive Science, one semester for graduates (MA), Department of Automatic Control and Computers, Polytechnic University of Bucharest
● (1997-2009) Assistant-Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Bucharest (Bucharest, Romania)
● (1997-2003) Initiator and co-ordinator of the Group for Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest (Bucharest, Romania)
● CEEPUS Project (coordinator lect. Gabriel Vacariu)
Academic related activities
● (14.05.2015) Presentation “Cognitive neuroscience”, at Symposium “Actual directions of research on consciousness”, Romanian Academy, Comitetul Român de Istoria şi Filosofia Ştiinţei şi Tehnicii, Divizia de Logică, Metodologie şi Filosofie a Ştiinţei, Grupul de Cercetări Interdisciplinare; Societatea Naţională de Neuroştiinţe, Facultatea de Medicină, Disciplina Fiziologie şi Neuroştiinţe (see the schedule Afis program- mai 14-15)
● (29.03.2014) Videoconference “Epistemologically different worlds applied to cognitive neuroscience”, Symposium of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Nuevo Leon (Monterrey, Mexico). (“I Simposium de la Unidad de Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica de los Servicios de Salud de Nuevo León y del Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey”). (Schedule at http://www.jornadasurp.com/#!horarios/ctnu) (a photo with this videoconference )
● (04.12.2013) Presentation “The world vs. epistemologically different worlds“, Department of Philosophy, Bucharest University
● (27.11.2013) Presentation “Did Markus Gabriel (Bonn University) plagiarize my ideas?“, Department of Philosophy, Bucharest University
● (06.11.2013) Round table on Mihai Vacariu’s book “In love with Tarkovski – A small treatise of living art”. Participants: Cristi Puiu, Elena Dulgheru, Gabriel Vacariu, Mihai Vacariu, Mihai Fulger at Cinemateca Romana, Eforie Room
● (28.06. 2013) I organized a Round-Table live on the Internet: “Micro-neuronal level and/or macro-neuronal level in explaining cognition”. Participants: John Bickle (Mississippi State University) at 13.00-New York (28th July), Adele Abrahamsen, William Bechtel (University of California, San Diego), Gabriel Vacariu (Bucharest University) at 20.00-Bucharest (28th July), and William Uttal (Arizona State University) at 07.00-Hawaii (29th July), Department of Philosophy, University of Bucharest. Parts of this round-table discussion at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_3I96MSwXpUjm2x6f6SaUA
● (22.07.2013) I organized the round-table: “The role of neuroscience in explaining cognition“. Participants: William Bechtel (Philosophy, University of California, San Diego), Adele Abrahamsen (Project Scientist in the Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego), Maria-Luiza Flonta (Neuroscience, Biology, UB),Mircea Dumitru (Philosophy, UB), Bogdan Amuzescu (Neuroscience, Biology, UB), Gabriel Vacariu (Philosophy, UB), Faculty of Philosophy (University of Bucharest).
● (20.06.2013) Presentation “Troubles with cognitive neuroscience and the hyperverse”, Department of Biology, Bucharest University
● (29.05.2013) “Prezentare despre viata si opera sculptorului Constantin Brancusi“, Facultate de Filosofie, Universitatea Bucuresti
● (09.05.2013) Presentation “Cognitive neuroscience and the hyperverse”, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University (Krakow, Poland)
● (04.04. 2013) Gheorghe Stefanov and Gabriel Vacariu: debate on the status of conceptual art, Department of Philosophy, University of Bucharest
● (29.11.2012) Presentation “The beauty and the hyperverse“, (A parallel between art and philsophy of the last century), Faculty of Philosophy, Univ. of Bucharest
● In 2012, I re-included my department in CEEPUS project (Central European Exchange Program for University Studies): “Cognitive Science, Knowledge Studies, and Knowledge Technologies”, University of Vienna, the main coordinator. Departments belong to universities from Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovacia, and Slovenia.
● (7.09.2012) Presentation “God died long time ago. How can we rule out the infinite?“, Summer school “Science, religion, philosophy: Teism vs. Ateism”, Department of philosophy, Univ. of Bucharest.
● (28.04.2012) Presentation “What kind of science is cognitive neuroscience?” in Symposium “The mind-brain relationship in cognitive neuroscience”, Department of Philosohy, Univ. of Bucharest
● (27-28.04.2012) I organized the symposium – “The mind-brain relationship in cognitive neuroscience” at Department of Theoretical Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest. Participants: Bogdan Amuzescu (Biology, University of Bucharest), Violeta Ciobanu (Psychology, University of Bucharest) Ioan Dumitrache (Faculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, Polytechnic University of Bucharest), Mircea Dumitru (Philosophy, University of Bucharest), Marius Dumitru (Christ Church, Oxford), Luiza-Maria Flonta (Biology, University of Bucharest), Gheorghe Stefanov (Philosophy, University of Bucharest), Gabriel Vacariu (Philosophy, University of Bucharest), Leon Zagrean (Neuroscience – University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest) Adriana Zbant (Philosophy, University of Bucharest)
● (16.11.2011) Presentation “Being and the Hyperverse” in “Seminars of Theoretical Philosophy”, Department of Philosophy, University of Buchares. Presentation PDF
● (16.11.2011) Round table “The role of philosophy in science“. Participants: Bogdan Amuzescu (biologie), Mircea Flonta, Ilie Parvu, Gheorghe Stefanov and Gabriel Vacariu
● (08.09.2011) Presentation – “The role of science in creating the philosophical system”; Summer School of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Bucharest. Romanian. English
● (26.03.2009) Presentation – “ ‘Representation’ in Cognitive Science“, “Engineering-Mind” Group, The Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, Bucharest
● (10.07.2007) Presentation – “The ‘unicorn-world’ and its Ptolemaic epicycles in cognitive science/philosophy of mind” at the 8th conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science, University of Adelaide, Australia.
http://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/humanities/ascs2007/ (abstract at “Download proceedings”)
● (09.2006) Presentation within Panel D (Are there useful ways to think about the mind? With Hales, Sutton, Vacariu) at INA/Brain Sciences: Neurophilosophy workshop, (Scope: the complex relationship between mind and brain, as viewed by psychiatrists, neuroscientists and philosophers), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
(at http://www.brainsciences.unsw.edu.au/BrainSciWeb.nsf/page/presentations – see INA/Brain Sciences UNSW Neurophilosophy Workshop, 10 September – (PDF) )
● (03.05.2002) (with Dalia Terhesiu) Presentation -“Brain, mind and Robinson Crusoe in the 21st century” – at the 19th Annual Workshop- “New Trends in Cognitive Science”- organized by the European Society for the Study of Cognitive System and Austrian Society for Cognitive Science, Salzburg, Vienna
● (03.2002) Co-ordinatorof“The Spring School on Cognitive Science”within the CEEPUS project and “Complexity Theory” Research Project. Participants- professors and students from: Faculty of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria; Department of Philosophy, Ljubljana, Slovenia; ELTE University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Mathematics, Department of Linguistics, Department of Philosophy, Department of Biology (University of Bucharest)
● (03.2002) Presentation -“The principle of ontological complementarity” – at “Spring School on Cognitive Science”, University of Bucharest, Bucharest
● (01.2002) Presentation -“Some key elements in Cognitive Science ” – at Washington University in Saint Louis, USA, Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology program
● (27-30.12.2001) Participant to APA annual meeting in Atlanta, USA
● (05.2001) Presentation “Representations“ at International Spring School on Cognitive Science, Bucharest, University of Bucharest
● (07.2000), (07.1999) Participant at International Summer School on Cognitive Science, Sofia, Bulgaria
● (05.2000), (05.2001), (03.2002) Initiator and co-ordinator of“International Spring School on Cognitive Science”, CEEPUS project.
● (06.1998) Participant at International Summer School on Philosophy of Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
● (09.1997) Participant at International Colloquium on Representation and Demarcation in Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Predeal, Romania
● (05.1997) Presentation “Remarks on Carnap’s AUFBAU” at Romanian-Finnish Colloquium on Logic, Philosophy of Science and Cognitive Science, Predeal, Romania
● (11.1993) Participant to a round table on “Determinism and Indeterminism” at the Romanian Academy, Institute of Philosophy, Iassy, Romania
General fields of interest:
Philosophy of Cognitive (Neuro)Science, Philosophy of Physics, Philosophy of mind, Kant
Special topics of interest: the relationship between mind and brain in cognitive science; the mind-body problem; localization, the binding problem, the spatial perception, “localization” in cognitive neuroscience, representation in cognitive science/philosophy of mind; emergence, supervenience and reductionism problems; computationalism, connectionism and dynamical system approaches in cognitive science, the “I” (self) in cognitive neuroscience and philosophy; the relationship between general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics (the relationship between micro- and macro-entities), what exist/is, entities and their interactions
Teaching experience – Courses and seminars
Thus spake the woods in soft entreaty; Astfel zise lin padurea
Arching boughs above me bent, Bolti asupra-mi clatinand;
But I whistled high, and laughing Suieram l-a ei chemare
Out into the open went. S-am iesit in camp razand.
(Mihai Eminescu, O remain dear one; http://www.mihaieminescu.ro/en/literary_work/poems/o_remain_dear_one.htm)
The necessary condition to conquer the world is to be against the entire world: I, the Spartan: don’t fight, be fight! EDWs
Contact: gvacariu [at] yahoo.com
Fi Communications (Public Relations)
www.ficommunications.com Mihai Vacariu